LADDER
Climbs from the open in stacked steps, each pause holding above the last one.
Formula
MEASUREDTurn low inside 09:31 to 09:34, then strictly higher lows with at most one non-rising high.
Turn minute; higher lows; rising highs; VWAP/EMA position; 5-day same-time demand.
The detector rule and what is measured beside it. Track's digest quotes the same row for every seat that carries this setup. All formulas on Track
Definition
The name climbs from the open in stacked steps. Each pause holds above the last one, so the lows rise like rungs.
Not this
A straight-line spike with no pauses is not a ladder. The steps are the shape.
Evidence checklist
What must be visible on the record before this shape is named. Find each item on an example below.
- A climb from the open in steps.
- Each pause holding above the previous one.
- The seat taken above the last pause.
- First sighting minute on the record.
Known on this record
- The shape name and the first minute the scanner saw it.
- The level out at 09:40 and the send ledger's time.
- The gap into the turn, measured at the 09:40 mark.
- The turn-window facts: entry vs range, window volume vs prior sessions, minutes from the window low.
- The tape verdict for the session.
- Catalyst classes, on sessions where the record carries them.
- Close, capture, day move, peak and the grade, all measured after the alert.
Not on this record
- EMA lines of any period.
- Volume beyond the turn window.
- An intraday chart or the bars behind one.
- The prior session's move.
- A catalyst's publication time.
- The price path between 09:40 and the close, beyond the peak minute.
A question to hold
The definition puts the seat above each pause. Does the entry-vs-range fact show it near the window high?
Seats from the record
Seats the scanner gave this shape, newest first. Each opens on Track with its full lesson.
| Session | Sym | Tape | Catalyst | Window vol | Lane | Capture | Result | Prov |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-21 | DHT | GREEN | · | 2.15x(2x to 4x) | · | -3.2% | ||
| 2026-09-21 | DT | GREEN | · | 1.61x(1x to 2x) | · | 0.9% | ||
| 2026-09-17 | UMAC | GREEN | · | · | · | 2.0% | ||
| 2026-09-08 | HPE | NEUTRAL | · | 1.41x(1x to 2x) | · | 4.4% | ||
| 2026-09-04 | SNDK | NEUTRAL | · | 1.36x(1x to 2x) | · | 6.2% | ||
| 2026-09-03 | DBX | GREEN | · | · | · | 1.1% | ||
| 2026-08-31 | NVO | RED | · | · | · | 0.4% | ||
| 2026-08-28 | BBWI | NEUTRAL | · | · | · | -2.0% | ||
| 2026-08-28 | TEM | NEUTRAL | · | · | · | -9.5% | ||
| 2026-08-17 | CRCL | NEUTRAL | · | · | · | 0.6% |
10 seats · 2026-08-17 to 2026-09-21 · alerted seats only · outcome: close against the alert price · misses and refused names not counted.
Counts only. A shape publishes no rate until its own record matures. the ladder rule
Study cues
Not available: no producer publishes per-condition observations with a timestamp and a source yet.
When one exists, a cue reads like this:
LADDER study candidate: 3 of 5 documented conditions present.
Every condition shows its timestamp, its source, and an unknown state when missing. A cue describes; it never directs.
Reading this page comes first. A cue can only be followed from its definition, and can be paused or deleted.